TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Landowski v. Chapoton

Landowski v. Chapoton, 100 N.W. 564 (Mich. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 27, 1904
Docket
No. 14
Judges
Grant, Other
Citations
100 N.W. 564137 Mich. 4291904 Mich. LEXIS 585
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
1. Master and Servant — Fellow-Servants. A scaffold builder in the employ of a building contractor is the fellow-servant of a brick carrier employed by the same contractor. 2. Same — Injuries to Servant — Scaffolding—Negligence. Where a building contractor furnished competent scaffold builders and sufficient good material for the construction of the scaffold, he was not liable for injuries to a servant, caused by the breaking of a center board, weakened by a knot, negligently used in constructing such scaffold.
Summary
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Joseph Landowski against Alexander Chapoton for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Grant

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Grant, J.

The defendant was a large contractor and builder. Among his various contracts was one for the erection of a church and parish house in connection therewith. Plaintiff was a brick carrier. While carrying brick upon a scaffold, it broke. He fell and was injured. The scaffold was first built by the carpenters. One for the use of masons is required to be stronger. In the necessary division of the work defendant had a scaffold builder, who had built scaffolds for 20 years, and never before had one broken. When the work was ready for the masons, the scaffold builder strengthened the scaffold as they deemed sufficient. The cause of the accident was a knot in the center plank. It was established by the testimony of both plaintiff and defendant that Mr. Chapoton employed competent men and furnished sufficient good material. If there was any negligence, it was that of a fellow-sérvant. The court properly directed a verdict for the defendant. The case is ruled by the following decisions : Quincy Mining Co. v. Kitts, 42 Mich. 34 ( 3 N. W. 240 ); Hoar v. Merritt, 62 Mich. 386 ( 29 N. W. 15 ); Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co., 103 Mich. 196 ( 61 N. W. 658 , 27 L. R. A. 266); Petaja v. Mining Co., 106 Mich. 463 ( 64 N. W. 335 , 66 N. W. 951 , 32 L. R. A. 435, 58 Am. St. Rep. 505 ).

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 21914: 11915: 119102026peak 1910 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Ohler1915 OK 397, 150 P. 98
  2. Strepanski v. Grand Rapids Plaster Co.127 N.W. 706 (Mich. 1910)
  3. Kaaro v. Ahmeek Mining Co.146 N.W. 149 (Mich. 1914)
  4. Risku v. Iron Cliffs Co.128 N.W. 747 (Mich. 1910)

Most recent

  1. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Ohler1915 OK 397, 150 P. 98
  2. Kaaro v. Ahmeek Mining Co.146 N.W. 149 (Mich. 1914)
  3. Risku v. Iron Cliffs Co.128 N.W. 747 (Mich. 1910)
  4. Strepanski v. Grand Rapids Plaster Co.127 N.W. 706 (Mich. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Quincy Mining Co. v. Kitts, 3 N.W. 240 (Mich. 1879) 59
Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co., 27 L.R.A. 266 (Mich. 1894) 44
Hoar v. Merritt, 29 N.W. 15 (Mich. 1886) 20
Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co., 106 Mich. 463 (1895) 36
People v. Knopf, 66 N.W. 951 (Mich. 1896) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list