TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Leonard

In re Leonard, 100 N.W. 579 (Mich. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 27, 1904
Docket
No. Calendar No. 20,592
Judges
Moore, Other
Citations
100 N.W. 579137 Mich. 457
Headnotes
Criminal Law — Breaking and Entering — Indeterminate Sentence. Under the indeterminate sentence law of 1903 (Act No. 136), the court has power to fix the minimum term of imprisonment for statutory burglary, as defined by section 11547, 3 Comp. Laws, no minimum being provided by the statute.
Summary
Habeas corpus proceedings by John M. Leonard to obtain his release from the State prison at Jackson.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Moore

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Moore, C. J.

Petitioner was convicted of the crime of burglary, committed on the 18th day of October, 1908, and on the 18th day of February, 1904, was sentenced to the State prison at Jackson for a maximum term of 15 years, and a minimum of 10 years, pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 136 of the Public Acts of 1903, known as the “Indeterminate Sentence Law,” which became operative ■about September 16, 1903. He now petitions for his re *458 lease from imprisonment upon the ground that the sentence imposed is in violation of the provisions of said act the claim being made that the minimum term provided by law for the crime of burglary is 1 year, and the court therefore had no authority to fix the same at 10 years.

The information, a copy of which is attached to the petition filed herein, shows that petitioner was charged with the crime of breaking and entering, in the night-time, a store not adjoining to or occupied with a dwelling house, with intent to commit the crime of larceny therein. The statute fixing the punishment for this offense (section 11547, 3 Comp. Laws) provides that one guilty thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the State prison not more than 15 years. No minimum sentence is provided, in the statute.

Section 1 of the indeterminate sentence law contains a provision that in all cases where no minimum sentence is-fixed by law, the court imposing sentence shall fix such minimum, which shall not be less than six months. Under this provision of the statute, the court was undoubtedly-authorized to fix the minimum sentence — none being fixed in the statute prescribing the penalty for the offense of which petitioner was convicted — and the sentence is clearly valid.

It necessarily follows that petitioner’s application for-release from imprisonment should be denied.

The other Justices concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11941: 11971: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Southard298 N.W. 457 (Mich. 1941)
  2. City of Lynchburg v. Peters133 S.E. 674 (Va. 1926)
  3. People v. Haggitt189 N.W.2d 842 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Most recent

  1. People v. Haggitt189 N.W.2d 842 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
  2. In re Southard298 N.W. 457 (Mich. 1941)
  3. City of Lynchburg v. Peters133 S.E. 674 (Va. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list