Toepel v. Wayne Circuit Judge
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Application for writ of mandamus or certiorari to review a motion to quash contempt proceedings. Denied for reason that these writs are not proper remedies at this stage of the proceedings. See following authorities: Palms v. Campau, 11 Mich. 109 ; Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 48 Mich. 582 ; Grand Rapids, etc., R. Co. v. Weiden, 69 Mich. 572 ; People v. Thompson, 108 Mich. 583 ; 4 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 236. Also the following unreported memorandum cases: Detroit, etc., R. Co. v. Salliotte (19,972½), decided May 13, 1903, and In re Keenan (20,581½), decided June 16, 1904.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.