Katzinski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Grant, J.
(after stating the facts). The law did not require the defendant to fence its yard. Rabidon v. Railway Co., 115 Mich. 390 (39 L. R. A. 405).
Defendant was under no obligation to station an employe at this place, or to have one upon its cars, to see that no trespassers were upon its right of way. It had done all that the law required, if it required even that, by posting warning notices along its yard limits, notifying all persons to keep off. The fact, even if it could have been shown, that persons were in the habit of going down this street and into the defendant’s yard, or that children were in *77 the habit of playing on or near its tracks, would not tend to fasten any liability upon it, under the circumstances of this case, when its side track was filled with cars liable to be moved at any time. The case is ruled by Rabidon v. Railway Co., supra; Sturgis v. Railway Co., 72 Mich. 619 ; O’Neil v. Railway Co., 101 Mich. 437 ; Formall v. Standard Oil Co., 127 Mich. 496 ; Ryan v. Towar, 128 Mich. 466 (55 L. R. A. 310); MeCaughna v. Electric Co., 129 Mich. 407 .
Judgment affirmed.
Carpenter, McAlvay, Montgomery, and Ostrander, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Rex Pierce, Jr., a Minor by His Next Friend, Janet Pierce v. New York Central Railroad Company
- Huggett v. Erb
- Eugene Richard Cygan, Administrator of the Estate of Eugene Frank Cygan, Deceased v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., a Virginia Corporation
- Seeley v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railway Co.
- Thomas v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
- Hamilton v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Most recent
- Rex Pierce, Jr., a Minor by His Next Friend, Janet Pierce v. New York Central Railroad Company
- Eugene Richard Cygan, Administrator of the Estate of Eugene Frank Cygan, Deceased v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., a Virginia Corporation
- Thomas v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
- Huggett v. Erb
- Seeley v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railway Co.
- Burtram v. Michigan Central Railroad
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.