TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Liebnitz v. Patterson

PEOPLE, ex rel. LIEBNITZ v. PATTERSON

People ex rel. Liebnitz v. Patterson, 214 Mich. 245 (1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 6, 1921
Docket
No. 100
Judges
Bird, Clark, Moore, Sharpe, Steere, Stone, Wiest
Citations
214 Mich. 245
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Justices of the Peace — Women if Otherwise Qualified Eucgibue. A woman who is a citizen of the United States, upwards of 21 years of age, and an elector of the township in which she was elected, is eligible to hold the office of justice of the peace in this State. People v. Baritz, 212 Mich. 580. On right of woman to hold office of justice of the peace, see note in 38 L. R. A. 209.
Summary
Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Petition by the people of the State of Michigan, on the relation of William Liebnitz, against Phoebe L. Patterson to determine defendant’s right to hold the office of justice of the peace. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Moore

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Moore, J.

This is a proceeding brought for the purpose of testing the question of whether a woman may hold the office of justice of the peace. Some question is raised as to the method of procedure. The case was heard upon the merits in the court below, and as all parties interested are desirous of having it so disposed of here we will dispose of it upon the merits.

The defendant was elected justice of the peace in the township of Plymouth in this State at the April election in 1919 and duly qualified. She at that time was a citizen of the United States, upwards of 21 years of age and was an elector of the township of Plymouth. The plaintiff was sued before her and moved to quash *246 the summons which was issued by her, claiming she could not hold the office.

In the recent case of People v. Barltz, 212 Mich. 580 , the question involved was. whether women might serve as jurors in courts of record. In a well considered opinion, written by Justice Stone and approved by all the members of this court, the question was answered in the affirmative. If we apply the principles stated in that ease to the facts in this case the conclusion follows that an affirmative answer must be given to the question, Can a woman otherwise qualified hold the office of justice of the peace in this State?

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

Steere, C. J., and Wiest, Fellows, Stone, Clark, Bird, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate240 Mass. 601 (1922)

Most recent

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate240 Mass. 601 (1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Barltz, 180 N.W. 423 (Mich. 1920) 24

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list