Hubbard v. Republic Motor Truck Co.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Clark, J.
Was the death of James Weeks due to an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of the employment? The board found that it was and made an award which defendants review here on certiorari. The employment ended Saturday noon, May 15, 1920. The following Monday forenoon a scratch upon Mr. Weeks’ hand was observed and there was testimony of swelling and of red streaks upon the hand. Later a doctor was consulted, who found a developed case of septic poisoning. The scratch and the resulting infection caused the death. Based upon the condition and appearance of the hand *360 on Monday forenoon, as related by witnesses, there was medical testimony that the scratch had been suffered not less than 48 hours and not more than 6 days prior thereto. This brought the time of injury within the last week of the employment. There was testimony that a part of the employment was spreading cotter pins, which was likely to produce scratches upon the hands, that Mr. Weeks and another employee had been so scratched several times in such work. There was no testimony that Mr. Weeks had suffered a scratch in' such employment during the last week thereof or at any other definite time. There was testimony that he did many and various chores about his home, including gardening and housework, and that he kept and cared for a cow.' A finding that the scratch whs an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of the employment rests upon conjecture and cannot be sustained.
Plaintiff relies on the cases of Buhse v. Whitehead & Kales Iron Works, 194 Mich. 413 , and McRae v. Morgan & Wright, 205 Mich. 493 . But in those cases there was evidence that accidental personal injury was actually received in the course of the employment, and this may be said of Kinney v. Cadillac Motor Car Co., 199 Mich. 435 . See Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co., 204 Mich. 130 ; Chaudier v. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co., 206 Mich. 433 ; Guthrie v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co., 200 Mich. 355 ; Draper v. Regents of University, 195 Mich. 449 .
The award is vacated.
Steere, C. J,., and Moore, Wiest, Fellows, Stone, Bird, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.