People v. Jamieson
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The parties are to submit supplemental briefs on the question whether the Supreme Court, for purposes of claims of entrapment, should adopt the "subjective test” as defined in the majority opinions in United States v Russell, 411 US 423 (1973), and Sorrells v United States, 287 US 435 (1932). The case is to be reargued and resubmitted. Reported below: 168 Mich App 332 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(plaintiff may bring action in tort when injured by defendant's negligent performance of contract even where no privity between parties)
-
(subcontractor may maintain action against engineers)
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.