City of Detroit v. Morgan
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Defendant appeals her conviction for violating an ordinance of tbe city of Detroit. *657 A review of the record demonstrates that defendant was denied a fair trial because she was denied right of cross-examination and an opportunity to produce a witness, but the record does not establish that defendant is entitled to have the charge against her dismissed as requested by defendant on this appeal.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.