TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Davis

PEOPLE v. GARY DAVIS (AFTER REMAND)

People v. Davis, 354 N.W.2d 287 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 27, 1984
Docket
No. 73182
Judges
Burns, Deming, Gribbs
Citations
354 N.W.2d 287135 Mich. App. 630

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

After Remand Before: Gribbs, P.J., and T. M. Burns and H. E. Deming, * JJ. Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted after a bench trial of felonious assault, MCL 750.82; MSA 28.277, and felony-firearm, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2). He was sentenced to consecutive terms of one to four years on the assault and two years on the felony-firearm. On defendant’s first appeal, this Court remanded to the trial court for additional findings of fact on the record to comply with GCR 1963, 517.1. People v Davis, 126 Mich App 66 ; 337 NW2d 315 (1983). A month later the trial judge read his supplemental findings into the record, reaffirming defendant’s convictions and sentences. Neither defendant, his counsel, nor the prosecutor was present at this proceeding. Defendant appeals, arguing that his presence was required during the reading of the findings into the record.

The purpose of a remand for the recording of further findings is to aid appellate review. People v Jackson, 390 Mich 621, 627-628 ; 212 NW2d 918 (1973); People v Davis, supra; People v Kelly, 122 Mich App 427 ; 333 NW2d 68 (1983). This purpose is not enhanced or hindered by the presence of defendant, his counsel, or the prosecutor. The recording of further findings is not a time for the presentation of additional evidence or argument, and the absence of defendant or his counsel would not prejudice defendant. We find no error.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 11996: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Blue444 N.W.2d 226 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989)
  2. Vogel v. Kalita (In re Kalita)202 B.R. 889 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Vogel v. Kalita (In re Kalita)202 B.R. 889 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1996)
  2. People v. Blue444 N.W.2d 226 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Davis, 337 N.W.2d 315 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983) 24
People v. Jackson, 212 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. 1973) 121
People v. Kelly, 333 N.W.2d 68 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list