Stoker v. City of Minneapolis
Eve Stoker v. City of Minneapolis
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gilfillan, C. J.
The defendant insists that plaintiff’s own evidence showed her to have been guilty of negligence that contributed to the injury, and that the case ought, therefore, to have been dismissed on its motion. On that point the evidence made the case a very close one, but we think different minds might fairly arrive at different conclusions upon it, and that the case was properly left to the jury.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.