Northwest Thresher Co. v. Dietlein
NORTHWEST THRESHER COMPANY v. ANDREW DIETLEIN
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The identical question presented in this case was involved in the case of J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Fronk, supra, page 39, 117 N. W. 229 , and was there decided adversely to appellant’s contention. We follow and apply the decision there made.
The additional point made in this ease, to the effect that the court below erred in not making findings of fact, is not well taken. It is unnecessary to make findings where an action is dismissed after trial on the merits, if, on the most favorable view of the evidence, no recovery can be had by plaintiff.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.