TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. MacMullan v. Scott

STATE ex rel. JAMES MacMULLAN v. HUGH R. SCOTT and Others

State ex rel. MacMullan v. Scott, 117 N.W. 846 (Minn. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 13, 1908
Docket
No. 16,020-(230)
Citations
117 N.W. 846105 Minn. 5251908 Minn. LEXIS 561
Disposition
Order to show cause discharged.
Summary
Petition by a qualified elector within the Fortieth election district, who received at the primary election the fourth highest number of votes cast for candidates for election as representatives from that district, for an order' directing the auditor of Hennepin county not to print the names of Frank E. Nimoeks and Fred B. Wright, who at the same election received respectively the highest and the second highest number of votes cast, upon the official ballot to be used at the general election on November 3, 1908, on the ground that said Nimoeks and said Wright were disqualified for and ineligible to the office, because they were representatives from that district and members of the legislature at the session of 1907, which passed an act increasing the compensation' of senators and representatives. An order to show cause having been made, the respondents answered and asserted that the relator was not authorized by law to maintain the proceeding, that the question of general ineligibility of candidates can be raised only by and in behalf of the state, and no action can be taken by, or on relation of, any individual except by permission of court, after refusal of the attorney general to act.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Ordered, that the order to show cause herein be, and it is hereby, discharged.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list