Gray v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
CLARENCE C. GRAY v. MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY
Gray v. Minneapolis & St. Louis R.R., 124 N.W. 1100 (Minn. 1910)
Headnotes
Reciprocal Demurrage Act— Case Followed.
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul under Laws 1907, c. 23, to recover $6 damages, and $100 as attorney’s fee to be taxed as costs, for delay in the delivery of three carloads of freight. The amended answer alleged that the only trains operated by defendant through the towns of Belview and Hazel Run, whence the freight was shipped, were interstate trains between Watertown, South Dakota, and Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, picking up freight at intermediate stations; that to have stopped the trains at the above stations and taken on the cars within the times mentioned in the complaint would have seriously interfered with interstate commerce, and that Laws 1907, c. 23, was unconstitutional and void. A demurrer to the answer on the ground that it stated no defense was sustained, Finehout, J. The case was tried before the same judge, who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $6 damages, and $50 attorney’s fee to be taxed as costs. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order, defendant appealed.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This case is controlled by the opinion in the case of Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. supra, page 25, 124 N. W. 819 .
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.