Viers v. Perry
M. G. VIERS v. CLINTON M. PERRY
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This appeal presents the sole question whether the trial court erred by its order granting the defendant’s motion to dissolve the *349 writ of attachment herein. The motion was made and opposed upon conflicting affidavits, which show no clear preponderance of proof opposed to the decision of the trial court. The case, then, falls within the rule that the determination of a question of fact, on the hearing of a motion on affidavits, will not be reversed, if there be evidence reasonably tending to support it. First Nat. Bank v. Randall, 38 Minn. 382 , 37 N. W. 799 ; State v. Madigan, 66 Minn. 10 , 68 N. W. 179 ; Stai v. Selden, 87 Minn. 271, 275 , 92 N. W. 6 ; First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425 , 116 N. W. 917 .
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.