TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Korpi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

MATTI KORPI v. OLIVER IRON MINING COMPANY

Korpi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 131 N.W. 372 (Minn. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 19, 1911
Docket
Nos. 16,986, 16,987 — (77,78)
Citations
131 N.W. 372114 Minn. 5251911 Minn. LEXIS 1157
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Complaint — allegation of proximate canse of injury.
Summary
Two actions in the district court for St. Louis county, one by the father of Nicolai Verneri Korpi, a minor nine years of age, to recover $5,000, expenses caused plaintiff and loss of wages while submitting to the operation of skin grafting for the benefit of his injured son, and the other, for the benefit of that son, to recover $15,000 damages for his injuries. From an order, Dibell, J., overruling defendant’s demurrers to the complaints, it appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Demurrer to a complaint, which charges that the defendant maintained an unprotected tub or vat in a public street of the village of Hibbing, into which it caused to be discharged hot water from a pipe connecting with a steam boiler located on defendant’s adjoining property j that plaintiff’s child was passing by, stopped, and was looking at the vat, when he became suddenly alarmed and frightened by a number of .children, who had congregated about and were playing in the vicinity, and as a result thereof slipped and fell into it, and was seriously scalded.

Held, it fairly appears from the facts stated that the proximate cause of the injury was the unguarded vat. McDowell v. Village of Preston, 104 Minn. 263 , 116 N. W. 470 , 18 L.R.A. (N.S.) 190. The complaint states a cause of action. Svendsen v. Village of Alden, 101 Minn. 158 , 112 N. W. 10 . Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 219152026peak 1915 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Conway v. City of Kinston169 N.C. 577 (1915)
  2. Conway v. Ice Co.86 S.E. 524 (N.C. 1915)

Most recent

  1. Conway v. Ice Co.86 S.E. 524 (N.C. 1915)
  2. Conway v. City of Kinston169 N.C. 577 (1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
McDowell v. Vill. of Preston, 116 N.W. 470 (Minn. 1908) 23
Svendsen v. Vintage of Alden, 112 N.W. 10 (Minn. 1907) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list