Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co.
ALICE JOHNSON v. CRESCENT CREAMERY COMPANY
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff was injured in the same accident as was the plaintiff in Sherwood *534 v. Crescent Creamery Company, supra, page 263, 153 N. W. 525 . Hie only claim on this appeal is that the verdict of $2,500 is excessive. We have examined the testimony and conclude that the verdict, while liberal, is not so out of proportion to fair compensation for the conditions testified to by plaintiff and her witnesses that we ought to interfere.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.