State v. Ruther
STATE v. AUGUST RUTHER
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The question certified in this cause, namely, whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to quash the indictment therein on the ground that his wife was required by the state to give evidence against him before the grand jury, was decided adversely to defendant’s contention in *489 the recent case of State v. Marshall, 140 Minn. 363 , 168 N. W. 174 , wherein the fact complained of was held not fatal to the indictment. That decision controls this case. The question certified herein is therefore answered in the negative and the cause remanded to the court below for such further proceedings as may properly come before it.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.