State ex rel. Anderson v. District Court
STATE EX REL. RALPH W. ANDERSON v. DISTRICT COURT OF BLUE EARTH COUNTY AND OTHERS
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Mandamus to compel the district court of Blue Earth county to change the place of trial of the case of Ervin Wilson v. Ralph W. Anderson and Thomas Wilson to Nobles county. Defendant Anderson resides in Nobles county, defendant Wilson in Blue Earth county. The latter is the father of the plaintiff, though they did not live together. The complaint charges negligence on the part of both defendants. Wilson was driving a team and buggy. In the rear of the buggy a cow was being led, driven by plaintiff. Defendant *490 Anderson came from' the rear in his automobile and plaintiff was run down and sustained severe injuries. He charges negligence contributing to cause the accident on the part of both defendants. Defendant Anderson served and filed an affidavit and demand for change of venue to Nobles county. The clerk did not transfer the papers and defendant moved the court to change the place of trial, "and for an order that the files be transferred. This motion was denied. The ground upon which the motion was based, and upon which this writ of mandamus is sought is that Thomas Wilson was made a defendant simply for the purpose of preventing a change of venue, that no cause of action was stated against him, and that he was without means to pay a judgment. The motion was presented to the trial court on conflicting affidavits. The complaint does state a cause of action against defendant Wilson and the proof was far from conclusive that he was not made a defendant in perfect good faith.
Writ denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.