TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Quale v. Penney

STATE EX REL. THEODORE QUALE v. GUY A. PENNEY

State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 174 N.W. 611 (Minn. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 21, 1919
Docket
No. 21,550
Citations
174 N.W. 611144 Minn. 4631919 Minn. LEXIS 763
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Appeal from order upon motion for judgment upon pleadings dismissed. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment upon pleadings. The same rule held to govern when application is made for a writ of mandamu^. [Reporter.]
Summary
Upon the relation of Theo. Quale the district court for Pennington county-granted its alternative writ of mandamus directed to Guy A,. Penney, as mayor of the -city of Thief River Falls, directing him to sign warrants issued by the city clerk of that city to petitioner in payment of his salary as city attorney for the months of January, February and 'March, 1919, and permit the same to be delivered to petitioner, or show cause why he had not done |so. From an order, Grindeland, J., granting respondent’s motion for judgment upon the pleadings, -denying a peremptory writ and dismissing the petition and alternative writ, petitioner appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11942: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Gresham v. Delaney4 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1942)
  2. Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.283 N.W. 750 (Minn. 1939)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Gresham v. Delaney4 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1942)
  2. Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.283 N.W. 750 (Minn. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list