TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lipman v. Slimmer

IN RE ESTATE OF ABRAHAM SLIMMER, ADOLPH LIPMAN v. ABRAHAM SLIMMER, JR., AND OTHERS

Lipman v. Slimmer, 178 N.W. 954 (Minn. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 3, 1920
Docket
No. 22,041
Citations
178 N.W. 954146 Minn. 4291920 Minn. LEXIS 642
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Bight of appeal from judgment limited to six months. The right of appeal from a judgment expires six months from the date of entry of the judgment. The time is not extended by application to vacate the judgment.
Summary
From an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Dickson, J., refusing to vacate the judgment of that court, Adolph Lipman appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Judgment in this case was entered December 30, 1918. On January 2, 1920, notice of motion to vacate the judgment was served. This motion was denied by order filed January 14, 1920. Written notice of the filing of this order was duly served January 17, 1920. On July 13, 1920, appellant served notice of appeal from the judgment and the order. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time.

The appeal must be dismissed. The time to appeal from the order expired “within thirty days after written notice of the same,” and the time to appeal from the judgment expired “within six months after the entry thereof.” G. S. 1913, § 8000.

The order of January 14 was in no sense a judgment and the time to appeal from it had expired long before the notice of appeal was given.

The contention that the time to appeal from the judgment did not commence to run until the motion to vacate it had been denied cannot be sustained.

*430 The facts are that an application to vacate the judgment was filed in February, 1919. This act was wholly ineffectual for any purpose without notice of the application being given. The notice of motion to vacate was served long after the time for appeal from the judgment had expired. But we do not predicate this decision on that ground. We base our decision on the proposition that the statute in language clear and not open to construction limits the time to appeal from a judgment to six months after entry thereof and that the act of the defeated party in moving to vacate the judgment cannot operate to extend that time.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11931: 11959: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Tombs v. Ashworth95 N.W.2d 423 (Minn. 1959)
  2. In re Robelen136 A. 279 (Del. Super. Ct. 1926)
  3. Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave2 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1931)

Most recent

  1. Tombs v. Ashworth95 N.W.2d 423 (Minn. 1959)
  2. Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave2 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1931)
  3. In re Robelen136 A. 279 (Del. Super. Ct. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list