TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilson v. Tauer

CHRIS WILSON v. R. TAUER

Wilson v. Tauer, 180 N.W. 93 (Minn. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 17, 1920
Docket
No. 21,896
Judges
Pee
Citations
180 N.W. 93147 Minn. 4661920 Minn. LEXIS 782
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Cited by 5
Headnotes
Order not appealable. Appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law, made after trial by the court without a jury. Appeal dismissed, because such an order is not appealable. [Reporter.]
Summary
Action in the district court for Beltrami county to recover a balance of $143.65 for work and labor. The case was tried before Wright, X, who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the action. From the findings and order dismissing the action, plaintiff appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Pee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Curiam.

The appeal in the above entitled action was taken from the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court, made after trial without a jury. The order is not appealable. Von Glahn v. Sommer, 11 Minn. 132 (203); Johnson v. Northern Pacific, F. F. & B. H. Ry. Co. 39 Minn. 30 , 38 N. W. 804 ; Holliston v. Ernston, 120 Minn. 507 , 139 N. W. 805 .

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1953: 11966: 21969: 11980: 119532026peak 1966 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shema v. Thorpe Bros.57 N.W.2d 157 (Minn. 1953)
  2. Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Carlton County145 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1966)
  3. Cucchiarella v. Kolodzieg166 N.W.2d 100 (Minn. 1969)
  4. Merz v. Oftedal144 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. 1966)
  5. Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Carlton County145 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Carlton County145 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1980)
  2. Cucchiarella v. Kolodzieg166 N.W.2d 100 (Minn. 1969)
  3. Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Carlton County145 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1966)
  4. Merz v. Oftedal144 N.W.2d 58 (Minn. 1966)
  5. Shema v. Thorpe Bros.57 N.W.2d 157 (Minn. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Holliston v. Ernston, 139 N.W. 805 (Minn. 1913) 9
Johnson v. Northern Pac., 38 N.W. 804 (Minn. 1888) 4
City of Winona v. Huff, 11 Minn. 119 (1866) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list