TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Johnson

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHN J. JOHNSON, SIVER ERICKSON AND OTHERS

In re Johnson, 184 N.W. 214 (Minn. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 10, 1921
Docket
No. 22,535
Citations
184 N.W. 214150 Minn. 5241921 Minn. LEXIS 846
Disposition
The motion of the county of Lyon to dismiss the appeal was granted.
Headnotes
Appeal and error >— appeal dismissed. On appeal from an order dismissing a writ to review the action of a county board in designating a certain highway as a state road and the action of the state commissioner of highways in consenting thereto, the only question presented was whether the board acted wisely and the commissioner acted wisely. Held-. These 'questions are not judicial but purely legislative and are not reviewable by the court on certiorari. For that reason the appeal was dismissed. [Reporter.]
Summary
Upon the relation of John G. Johnson and others the district court for Lyon county granted its writ of certiorari directed to the county board of that county to review the action of the board in designating a certain highway in that county as a state road and an order of the state commissioner of highways in consenting thereto. From an order dismissing the writ, Olson, J., relators appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The trial court issued a writ of certiorari to review the action of the county board of Lyon county in designating a certain highway in said county as a state road and also to review the order of the state commissioner of highways consenting to such designation. On the return the court discharged and dismissed the writ. The relators appeal. Respondents move to dismiss the appeal. The case is to be determined on the record made by the officers whose action is sought to be reviewed. State v. City of Duluth, 125 Minn. 425 , 147 N. W. 820 . On the record we see no question presented except the question whether the county board acted wisely in designating the road in question a state road and whether the commissioner of highways acted wisely in consenting to such designation. These questions are not judicial but purely legislative and are not reviewable by the court on certiorari.

See Sinclair v. Board of County Commissioners of Winona County, 23 *525 Minn. 404 , 23 Am. Rep. 694 ; Christlieb v. County of Hennepin, 41 Minn. 142 , 42 N. W. 930 ; State v. Clough, 64 Minn. 378 , 67 N. W. 202 .

The appeal is therefore manifestly without merit and on that ground should be dismissed.

See Johnson v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 68 Minn. 408 , 71 N. W. 619 ; Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 100 Minn. 144 , 110 N. W. 624 .

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 11945: 11951: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Hardy v. Clough, 67 N.W. 202 (Minn. 1896) 16
Johnson v. St. Paul City Ry. Co., 71 N.W. 619 (Minn. 1897) 15
State ex rel. Sholund v. Mayor & Common Council, 147 N.W. 820 (Minn. 1914) 10
Christlieb v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 42 N.W. 930 (Minn. 1889) 5
Kennedy v. Fid. & Cas. Co., 110 N.W. 624 (Minn. 1907) 4
Sinclair v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 23 Minn. 404 (1877) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list