Svendsgaard v. Svendsgaard
J. SVENDSGAARD v. MABEL SVENDSGAARD
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dibell, J.
Tbe trial court granted defendant’s motion to dissolve a writ of attacbment issued upon tbe ground of a fraudulent disposition of property. Tbe plaintiff appeals.
Tbe defendant meets tbe affidavit for attacbment by a direct denial. Tbe plaintiff’s showing in opposition does not overcome it as a matter of law; indeed, it would be difficult to sustain an order of tbe trial court refusing to dissolve. It is unnecessary to discuss tbe affidavits. Most of tbe record is matter extraneous to tbe issue arising on tbe motion.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.