State v. Long
STATE v. FRANK LONG
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dibell, J.
The defendant was found guilty of bastardy and appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The child was born on February 16, 1923. The woman had intercourse with a man other than the defendant on May 17, 1922. She claims that she had intercourse with the defendant on June 10, 1922. The defendant admits that he had intercourse, with the woman, but claims that it was in the latter part of July, 1922. Both the woman and the defendant are corroborated. The woman’s testimony shows a normal menstrual period commencing June 1, 1922, and lasting until June 6, 1922. The question of guilt was one of fact for the jury subject to the control of the trial court.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.