Hallada v. Great Northern Railway
WILLIAM E. HALLADA, JR. v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Our opinion filed February 25, 1955, *582 affirmed the order appealed from if plaintiff within ten days after the filing of the remittitur in the lower court shall file his written consent to a reduced verdict in the sum of $105,000. Hallada v. G. N. Ry. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 . Within the ten-day period plaintiff filed his written consent to a reduction of the verdict. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.