TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Grand Gulf & Port Gibson Railroad v. Buck

Grand Gulf and Port Gibson Railroad Co. v. C. E. Buck, tax-collector

Grand Gulf & Port Gibson R.R. v. Buck, 53 Miss. 246 (1876)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1876
Judges
Chalmers
Citations
53 Miss. 246
Headnotes
Taxation. Exemption. Charter. Where, by the terms of its charter, the capital stock of a railroad company, and all other property belonging to or connected with the road, are exempted from taxation until eight years after the road shall be put in operation, the legislature cannot, before the expiration of the period, levy a privilege tax upon the corporation.
Summary
Error to the Circuit Court of Claiborne County. Hon. Uriah Millsaps, Judge. This was an action of replevin by the railroad company against C. E. Buck, sheriff and tax-collector, to recover a locomotive engine levied on for a privilege tax alleged to be due from the company to the State, under the act of 25th February, 1875 (Acts 1875, p. 67), which the company refused to pay, claiming exemption under its amended charter (Acts 1866, p. 137). It was tried by the judge, in lieu of a jury, on an agreed state of facts. From a judgment for the defendant the company prosecutes this writ of error. cited Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, § 496. cited Wool-man v. State, 2 Swan, 353; State v. Stevens, 4 Texas, 137; State v. Bock, 9 Texas, 369 ; 42 Penn. St. 424; 37 N. Y. 364. cited Wilmington Railroad v. Reid, 13 Wall. 264; M. O. Railroad v. Mosely, 52 Miss. 127.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Chalmers

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Chalmers, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the terms of the charter of the plaintiff in error it is declared “ that the capital stock of said company, and all other property belonging to or connected with said railroad shall be exempt from all taxation until eight years after said road shall be put in operation.”

The only question presented is, whether the legislature is thereby prohibited before the expiration of the period from levying a tax, designated as a privilege tax, upon the corporation.

We think that the question must manifestly be answered in the affirmative, both upon reason and authority. Wilmington Railroad v. Reid, 13 Wall. 264 ; M. O. Railroad v. Mosely, 52 Miss. 127 .

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with direction to enter judgment for the plaintiff below.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1884–1885: 11898–1899: 118842026peak 1884 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grenada County Supervisors v. Brogden112 U.S. 261 (1884)
  2. Hancock v. Singer Manufacturing Co.41 A. 846 (N.J. 1898)

Most recent

  1. Hancock v. Singer Manufacturing Co.41 A. 846 (N.J. 1898)
  2. Grenada County Supervisors v. Brogden112 U.S. 261 (1884)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Wilmington R.R. v. Reid, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 264 (1872) 63
Mobile & Ohio R.R. v. Moseley, 52 Miss. 127 (1876) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list