TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother

Lucinda A. Bridges and Husband v. Kuykendall & Brother

Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother, 58 Miss. 827 (1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1881
Judges
Campbell
Citations
58 Miss. 827
Syllabus
Bill oip Exceptions. Amendment or correction. Record. After a bill of exceptions has been signed and delivered by the judge it becomes a part of the record of the ease, and cannot be amended or corrected by him nor by this court.
Summary
Motion in Supreme Court. On the 6th of May, 1879, a judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court of Tallahatchie County against the defendants in this case, who took an appeal therefrom. On the same day a motion for a new trial was overruled, and leave was given the appellants to prepare a bill of exceptions within sixty days thereafter. Ou the 18th of June, 1879, the judge signed -what was intended for a bill of exceptions, and it was incorporated in the record sent to this court. As contained in the record, it failed to show that any exception was taken to the action of the court in reference to any of the matters embraced in it. In order to cure that defect, the appellants filed in this court a paper purporting to be the original bill of exceptions, which has attached to it a certificate of the circuit judge, dated March 10, 1881, to the effect that he inadvertently erased that part of the bill which contained the exceptions, and signed his name above it. The appellees made a ■motion to strike from the files of this court the paper purporting to be the original bill of exceptions. cited the following authorities : 1 Greenl. on Ev., sect. 502 ; Shirley v. Fearne, 4 Geo. 653 ; Mandeville v. Slockett, 6 Cushm. 398 ; Hill, on New Tr. 500-503. cited the following authorities: Vicksburg & Meridian R. Go. v. Ragsdale, 51 Miss. 447 ; Kimball v. Mitchell, 57 Miss. 632.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Campbell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A bill of exceptions, when signed and delivered by the judge, is a part of the record of the case in which it is taken, and, like any other part of the record in the cause, is not subject to alteration or amendment by the judge at his pleasure. If it is wrong when it is made part of the record in the cause, it must remain so, for no authority exists for its correction, either by this court or by the judge who signed it. Bank v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9 ; Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 394 ; The People v. Romero, 18 Cal. 89 ; Heard v. Heard, 8 Ga. 380 ; Georgia v. Powers, 14 Ga. 388 ; Hamilton v. Burch, 28 Ind. 233 ; Givens v. Bradley, 3 Bibb, 192 ; Shepard v. Hull, 42 Me. 377 ; Stimpson v. Railroad Co., 3 How. (U. S.) 553.

Motion sustained.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1885–1886: 11897–1898: 11905–1906: 11909–1910: 118852026peak 1885 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Estes51 P. 77 (Or. 1898)
  2. Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.50 S.E. 825 (W. Va. 1905)
  3. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.101 P. 699 (Utah 1909)
  4. Dreyfus v. Cage62 Miss. 605 (1885)

Most recent

  1. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.101 P. 699 (Utah 1909)
  2. Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.50 S.E. 825 (W. Va. 1905)
  3. State v. Estes51 P. 77 (Or. 1898)
  4. Dreyfus v. Cage62 Miss. 605 (1885)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 8

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Romero, 18 Cal. 89 (1861) 36
Branch Bank at Decatur v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9 (1843) 20
Hamilton v. Burch, 28 Ind. 233 (1867) 19
Givens v. Bradley, 6 Ky. 192 (1813) 15
State ex rel. Hodges v. Powers, 14 Ga. 388 (1853) 8
Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 394 (1850) 8
Heard v. Heard, 8 Ga. 380 (1850) 5
Patterson v. Creighton, 42 Me. 367 (1856) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list