TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brewer v. Mullins

Richard Brewer v. Winfield S. Mullins

Brewer v. Mullins, 52 So. 257 (Miss. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1910
Judges
Anderson
Citations
52 So. 25797 Miss. 353
Syllabus
Witnesses. Unimpeached. Testimony laudatory of. Truth and veracity. Harmless error, when not. Testimony laudatory of the character of a witness for truth and veracity is not admissible where the witness ‘has not heen assailed, and error in its admission cannot be adjudged harmless where the evidence on the real issue in the case was so evenly balanced that it may have influenced the verdict.
Summary
Erom the circuit court of Noxubee county. Hon. John L. Buckley, Judge. Brewer, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; Mullins, appellee, became defendant there by intervention. Erom a judg1-. ment in defendant’s favor plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The facts as stated by Anderson, J., are as follows:— “This is a replevin suit for a mule, brought by the appellant, B. Brewer, Sr., against Cunningham Bros., who disclaimed any title. The appellee, AV. S. Mullins, who it seems got possession of the mule after the writ of replevin had been sued out, was admitted to defend. The suit proceeded as if it had been originally brought against Mullins. There was a verdict and judgment for Mullins, from which Brewer prosecutes this appeal. “A. great deal of testimony was taken on both sides. Both of the paidies to the suit, .Brewer and Mullins, testified; each claiming that he had lost a mule and positively identifying the one in question as the one lost. Each was supported in his contention by witnesse's to the same effect. It appears from the record that the question of fact as to the ownership of the mule involved was a close one. J. P. Smith was introduced as a witness by Brewer. On cross-examination by the attorney for Mullins he was asked, over the objection of Brewer’s attorney, whether Mullins was a truthful man, to which he answered that he was; that he was as truthful a man as there was in the country. The only assignment of error is that the court should not have permitted this testimony, because of the fact that no testimony had been offered by Brewer impeaching the character of Mullins for truth and veracity.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Anderson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Anderson, J.,

after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

The court erred in permitting testimony to uphold the character of the witness Mullins for truth and veracity, when it had *355 not been directly assailed. It was not an issue before the jury, and could not be made one, except by bis adversary attacking it in the manner laid down by law. The issue of fact before the jury seems to have been about evenly balanced. Under these circumstances, such testimony probably had influential weight with the jury.

Reversed- and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 11929: 11952: 11983: 219232026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pickett v. State443 So. 2d 796 (Miss. 1983)
  2. Jackson v. State443 So. 2d 803 (Miss. 1983) · Dissent
  3. McEwen v. State96 So. 690 (Miss. 1923)
  4. Tiner v. State59 So. 2d 287 (Miss. 1952)
  5. Mohead v. Gilmer Grocery Co.121 So. 143 (Miss. 1929)

Most recent

  1. Jackson v. State443 So. 2d 803 (Miss. 1983) · Dissent
  2. Pickett v. State443 So. 2d 796 (Miss. 1983)
  3. Tiner v. State59 So. 2d 287 (Miss. 1952)
  4. Mohead v. Gilmer Grocery Co.121 So. 143 (Miss. 1929)
  5. McEwen v. State96 So. 690 (Miss. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list