TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McFadden v. Buckley

Geo. H. McFadden v. W. W. Buckley

McFadden v. Buckley, 53 So. 351 (Miss. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1910
Judges
Whitfield
Citations
53 So. 35198 Miss. 28
Syllabus
Evidence. Peremptory instruction-. Where in a suit for several items the evidence as to one item is so overwhelming for the plaintiff as that the court should set aside a verdict against him, the court should grant a peremptory instruction for plaintiff as to such item.
Summary
Appeal from circuit court of Clark county. Hon; D. W. Heidlebukg, Special Judge. Suit by Geo. H. McFadden et al. against W. W. Buckley et al. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff ap-. peals. Counsel on both sides filed elaborate briefs, but dealing only with the facts in the case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Whitfield

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Whitfield, C.

The evidence in this record is overwhelming that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the compress storage *29 charges, amounting to nineteen dollars and ninety-five cents. The evidence on the part of the defendant as to this item is so insufficient that, if a verdict had been found for the defendant on that testimony, the court should have promptly set it aside; and for this reason the court should have granted the peremptory instruction asked by the plaintiff for this item.

It is also insisted that there should have been a peremptory instruction for an item of seven dollars and fifty cents claimed to have been overpayment by clerical mistake in addition. The defendants admit the mistake but insist that on the record they were entitled to two items of five dollars and six cents and two dollars and forty-five cents, which about offset the plaintiff’s claim for seven dollars and fifty cents. As the case must be reversed for the reason indicated, we pretermit any expression of opinion as to the item of seven dollars and ■fifty cents, and also as to any other matter involved in the case. Reversed.

Pee Cueiam. For the reasons- indicated, the above ■opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and the .judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 11922: 11939: 11940: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Bennett90 So. 113 (Miss. 1921)
  2. Truckers Exchange Bank v. Conroy199 So. 301 (Miss. 1940) · Dissent
  3. Thomas v. State92 So. 225 (Miss. 1922)
  4. Thomas v. Williamson187 So. 220 (Miss. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Truckers Exchange Bank v. Conroy199 So. 301 (Miss. 1940) · Dissent
  2. Thomas v. Williamson187 So. 220 (Miss. 1939)
  3. Thomas v. State92 So. 225 (Miss. 1922)
  4. Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Bennett90 So. 113 (Miss. 1921)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list