TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Supreme Lodge K. P. v. Hines

Supreme Lodge K. P. v. Hines, 68 So. 485 (Miss. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1915
Judges
Stevens
Citations
68 So. 485109 Miss. 500
Syllabus
Appeal and Ebbok. Sueessive appeals. Disposition. Affirmance. Where all questions raised on a second appeal were settled adversely to appellant by the opinion of the 'supreme court, on the first appeal, and the proceedings upon the second trial in the court below, were in' accordance with the supreme court opinion on the first appeal, the case will be affirmed.
Summary
Appeal from the circuit court of Panola county. Hon. N. A. Taylor, Judge. Suit by Mrs. Lily Baker Hines against the Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias. ' Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Appellee was plaintiff in the court below’and appellant was defendant.. This case was in this court at a former term and was reversed and remanded. The opinion of the court in the former appeal states the facts. See 103 Miss. 374, 60 So. 333. The instruction (No. 1) complained of on this appeal, is as follows: “The court charges the jury that there is no evidence in this record upon which to base a verdict that plaintiff was engaged in a duel at the time he was killed.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Stevens

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Stevens, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was before this court once before, and all questions raised on this appeal were settled adversely to appellant by the opinion of this court as reported in 103 Miss. 374 , 60 So. 333 . The proceedings upon the second trial in the court below and instruction No. 1 for plaintiff complained of were in accordance with the views of this court, as expressed in our former opinion.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1917: 119172026peak 1917 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brewer v. Browning76 So. 267 (Miss. 1917) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Brewer v. Browning76 So. 267 (Miss. 1917) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Baker v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias, 60 So. 333 (Miss. 1912) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list