Brazeale v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Smith, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a conviction for having intoxicating liquor in possession. When arrested, the appellant was in the act of taking a drink of whisky from a bottle. According to his version of the matter, the liquor Avas the property of another, Avho had just handed it to him, so that he might take a drink thereof.
The court charged the jury, at the request of the state, to find the defendant guilty if they believed from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that he — “did Avillfully and unlawfully take into his hands and thereby have in his possession a bottle containing intoxicating liquor, commonly called ‘white lightning whisky,’ for the purpose of taking a drink thereof.”
The question raised by this instruction, in the last analysis, is simply this: Is it a crime to take a drink of intoxicating liquor? The statute does not so provide, as could have been very easily done, had the'legislature so desired; its language being:
“It shall be unlawful for any person ... to have, control or possess” intoxicating liquor. Section -2, chapter 189, Laws 1918.
The possession contemplated by the statute is of more substantial character than that which is for the purpose of and to the extent only that is necessary for taking a *174 drink. Harness v. State, 130 Miss. 673 , 95 So. 64 ; Anderson v. State (Miss.), 96 So. 163 . The appellant was entitled to, but seems not to have requested, an instruction charging the jury to acquit him.
Reversed and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.