TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dawsey v. State

Dawsey v. State, 100 So. 526 (Miss. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 16, 1924
Docket
No. 24025
Judges
Sykes
Citations
100 So. 526136 Miss. 181924 Miss. LEXIS 105

Opinion of the Court — Sykes

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sykes, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

From a conviction for having in his possession a whisky still, and a judgment of the court sentencing appellant-to serve a term of three years in the penitentiary, this appeal is prosecuted.

The only question necessary to be considered by us is whether or not the defendant is charged with any crime or offense in the indictment. • Otaitting the formal parts, the indictment reads that <A. P. Dawsey and 0. W. Dawsey “did willfully and unlawfully and feloniously have in their possession a whisky still, against the peace and dignity of the state of Mississippi.” This indictment was attempted to be drawn under chapter 211, Laws of 1922. This court, in the case of State v. Speaks, 132 Miss. 159 , 96 So. 176 , held that it was neces *22 sary to negative in the indictment the exceptions contained in this act by proper averment; otherwise, that no offense is charged.

The indictment in the Speaks case averred that the defendant “did then and there willfully and feloniously own, control, and knowingly have in his possession the integral parts of a still.” The present indictment contains the additional- word “unlawfully” and the word “whisky.” The use of these two words in the present indictment does not negative the exceptions stated in the act, and it follows, under the authority of the Speaks case, this indictment charges no offense. This is not a formal defect in an indictment, which is cured after verdict.

-The judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the appellant will be held to await the action of the grand jury.

Reversed and remanded

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 21926: 21929: 21936: 119252026peak 1925 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ladnier v. State124 So. 432 (Miss. 1929)
  2. Powe v. State169 So. 763 (Miss. 1936)
  3. State v. Clark110 So. 447 (Miss. 1926)
  4. Armstrong v. State120 So. 574 (Miss. 1929)
  5. Moran v. State102 So. 388 (Miss. 1925)
  6. Dawsey v. State110 So. 239 (Miss. 1926)

Most recent

  1. Powe v. State169 So. 763 (Miss. 1936)
  2. Ladnier v. State124 So. 432 (Miss. 1929)
  3. Armstrong v. State120 So. 574 (Miss. 1929)
  4. State v. Clark110 So. 447 (Miss. 1926)
  5. Dawsey v. State110 So. 239 (Miss. 1926)
  6. Mitchell v. State103 So. 815 (Miss. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Speaks, 96 So. 171 (Miss. 1923) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list