TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cordell v. State

Cordell v. State, 101 So. 380 (Miss. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Mississippi Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 6, 1924
Docket
No. 23990
Judges
Anderson
Citations
101 So. 380136 Miss. 2931924 Miss. LEXIS 130

Opinion of the Court — Anderson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant J. C. Cordell, was indicted and convicted in the circuit court of Bolivar county of the crime of shooting with intent to kill Ernest Arnold '.and sentenced to- one year in the penitentary, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant was indebted to Ernest Arnold. Arnold went to-appellant’s home and demanded payment of the indebtedness due him by appellant. An altercation between them followed, resulting; in appellant shooting Arnold with a pistol. Appellant’s, evidence tended to show that, at the time, of the shooting, Arnold was the aggressor and appellant shot in self-defense; that, during the altercation, Arnold made a move, with his hand toward his pocket as if to pull a pistol, and thereupon appellant drew his pistol and shot Arnold.

Appellant as a part of his case of self-defense offered evidence to prove that previous to- the shooting Arnold had threatened to kill' appellant. The threat which appellant offered to prove, and which was ruled out by the court, was in the nature of a conditional threat, which was the ground upon which the trial court ruled it out. Appellant offered witnesses to prove in substance that shortly before the shooting Arnold said in their presence that, if appellant did not pay him (Arnold) what he owed him, he would kill appellant. Appellant’s evidence tended to show that immediately before the shooting Arnold demanded of appellant payment of what appellant was due him, which appellant stated he could not pay until the next day. Therefore, according to appellant’s evidence, the contingency upon which Arnold’s threat was based had been met. Appellant’s evidence of Arnold’s threats should have been admitted. Clark v. State, 123 Miss. 147 , 85 So. 188 .

Reversed, and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11976: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sharplin v. State330 So. 2d 591 (Miss. 1976)
  2. Smith v. State118 So. 710 (Miss. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Sharplin v. State330 So. 2d 591 (Miss. 1976)
  2. Smith v. State118 So. 710 (Miss. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Clark v. State, 85 So. 188 (Miss. 1920) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list