Kelly v. State
Echols Futrell Kelly and Charles Wallace v. State
Kelly v. State, 124 So. 2d 844 (Miss. 1960)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hall, J.
This case presents purely a question of fact as there was testimony sharply conflicting and the jury had decided the case on this undisputed testimony. That being true, the judgment of the lower court should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Lee, Arrington, Gillespie and McElroy, JJ., concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.