Middleton v. Hoff
MIDDLETON & RILEY v. HOFF
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Scott, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question in this cause, is as to the instruction of the court on the question of fraud. The court assumed the power of instructing the jury that the transaction out of which the controversy arose was fraudulent. This was erroneous for the reasons given in the opinion of *416 Kuykendall, to the use of Middleton & Perry vs. McDonald and Vineyard decided at this term.
The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.