TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Middleton v. Hoff

MIDDLETON & RILEY v. HOFF

Middleton v. Hoff, 15 Mo. 415 (1852)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1852
Judges
Scott
Citations
15 Mo. 415
Headnotes
in ail cases arising under the 10th section of the act concerning fraudulent conveyances, the jury, not the court, are the triers, whether the transaction is fraudulent or not: Kuykendall to the use of Middleton, Perry & Co. vs. McDonald and Vinyard; page 416.
Summary
ERROR to Buchanan Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Scott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question in this cause, is as to the instruction of the court on the question of fraud. The court assumed the power of instructing the jury that the transaction out of which the controversy arose was fraudulent. This was erroneous for the reasons given in the opinion of *416 Kuykendall, to the use of Middleton & Perry vs. McDonald and Vineyard decided at this term.

The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list