TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

St. Louis Hospital Ass'n v. Wegman

St. Louis Hospital Association, in Error v. Wegman, Administrator of Williams, in Error

St. Louis Hosp. Ass'n v. Wegman, 21 Mo. 17 (1855)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1855
Judges
Scott
Citations
21 Mo. 17
Headnotes
1. Same case, 19 Bio. Rep. 609, and Northcutt v. Northmtt, 20 Bio. Rep. 266, affirmed.
Summary
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. This was a proceeding commenced in the St. Louis Circuit Court to establish the will of John Williams, previously rejected in the Probate Court. It is the same case reported in 19 Mo. Rep. 609, and there reversed for an insufficient finding of the facts. After it was remanded, it was again tried by the court without a jury, and the following facts found- in regard to the circumstances attending the execution of the will: “That Williams being too feeble from illness to write his name, P. B. Garesche, at the request and in the presence of Williams, wrote the name, “John Williams,” and the words, “his mark,” leaving a blank for the mark, for the purpose and with the intention on the part of said Williams that he should affix his mark thereto ; and that Williams, in fulfillment of such intention, did accordingly make his mark in the blank left therefor between the Christian and the sirname, designating the same as a signing or execution of the paper by him, and thereupon did acknowledge the mark as his signature, and did publish and declare the paper signed as and for his last will and testament,” &c. The will was attested by Garesche and another as witnesses,, but the attestation of Garesche omitted to state that he wrote the name of the testator at his request. Upon these facts, the Circuit Court refused to establish the will.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Scott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Scott, Judge.

It appears that the testator’s- name was-signed to this will at his request. The case, then, is within the words of the statute. This subject was considered at the lasfc *18 term of this court at Jefferson city, in tbe case of Northcutt v. Northcutt. It was there held that the cross could only be regarded as a signing within the statute, when 'that mark alone was used; that if, in addition to the cross, the name of the testator was subscribed, at his request, then it was a case within the statute. The other judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1874–1875: 11914–1915: 118742026peak 1874 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Catlett v. Catlett55 Mo. 330 (1874)
  2. Wilson v. Craig150 P. 1179 (Wash. 1915)

Most recent

  1. Wilson v. Craig150 P. 1179 (Wash. 1915)
  2. Catlett v. Catlett55 Mo. 330 (1874)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list