State v. Blankenship
The State, in Error v. Blankenship, in Error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ryland, Judge.
This case involves the same questions as have been just settled in the case of the State v. Havely. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the case remanded. See opinion in Havely’s case, which is adopted for this case, rmitati s mutandis; Judge Leonard concurring ; Judge Scott dissenting.
Scott, Judge.
For my view, with regard to this ease, reference is made to my opinion in the case of State v. Havely, decided at this term.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.