TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Huntington v. House

Huntington and wife v. House

Huntington v. House, 22 Mo. 365 (1856)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1856
Judges
Leonard
Citations
22 Mo. 365
Headnotes
X. In a suit by husband and wife under the 'practice act of 1849, the affidavit of the husband is a sufficient verification of the petition. 2. It is too late to object to the verification of a petition when the case is called for trial.
Summary
Jlppeal from Weston Court of Common Pleas. Action for slander and malicious prosecution, brought by Huntington and wife against House. Tbe petition was verified by tbe affidavit of Huntington for himself alone. Tbe defendant answered. When tbe case was called for trial, tbe defendant moved to dismiss tbe suit as to tbe wife of Huntington, because tbe petition was not sworn to by ber, nor ber agent or attorney. Tbe motion was sustained. Tbe plaintiffs excepted, and, after a nonsuit submitted to by Huntington, appealed to this court. insisted that tbe verification by the affidavit of tbe husband was sufficient, and that, if not, tbe objection came too late. (Practice Act of 1849, art. 7, § 2. Alfred v. Watkins, 1 N. Y. Code Rep. '343-412, N. S.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Leonard

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Leonard, Judge.

Tbe judgment here must be reversed and tbe cause remanded. Tbe affidavit of tbe husband was a sufficient verification of tbe petition. The objection, too, if other *366 wise well taken, ought not to have been allowed on the calling of the cause for trial. No purpose of justice can be answered by allowing a party, who has thus far waived the objection, to come forward with it at that late hour. The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1863–1864: 11887–1888: 11935–1936: 118632026peak 1863 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Rains v. Moulder90 S.W.2d 81 (Mo. 1936)
  2. Ruch v. Jones33 Mo. 393 (1863)
  3. Howland v. Reeves25 Mo. App. 458 (1887)

Most recent

  1. Rains v. Moulder90 S.W.2d 81 (Mo. 1936)
  2. Howland v. Reeves25 Mo. App. 458 (1887)
  3. Ruch v. Jones33 Mo. 393 (1863)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list