Boernstein v. Heinrichs
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Leonard, Judge.
The case seems to have been set for'trial by consent on a particular day in tbe return term, and was on that day postponed by like consent to a subsequent day in the same term. And the defendant, after a trial in his absence at the time agreed upon, can not withdraw his consent by subsequently insisting that the cause was not triable of right at that term. He has concluded himself by his own act, even if he were in time with his motion. The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.