Ballentine v. Pratt
Ballentine, in Error v. Pratt, in Error
Ballentine v. Pratt, 28 Mo. 106 (1859)
Headnotes
1. Judgment affirmed.
Summary
Error to Linn Circuit Court.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Scott, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The instructions have been examined, as.well those for the plaintiffs as that for the defendant. The instructions correctly stated the law of the case, and as there was contradictory evidence, it was for the jury to determine its credibility.
Affirmed;
Judge Richardson concurs. Judge Napton absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.