TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Farrell v. Fritschle

Farrell v. Fritschle, 30 Mo. 190 (1860)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1860
Judges
Scott
Citations
30 Mo. 190
Headnotes
1. In the case of the non-payment of a negotiable promissory note, which has been negotiated, the four per cent, damages, allowed by the seventh section of the act concerning bills of exchange and negotiable promissory notes, (R. C. 1855, p. 291,) can not be recovered, if payment of the principal sum, with the interest and charges of protest he made within twenty days after demand or notice of dishonor. 2. If suit he brought on such a note within twenty days from the maturity of the note, the plaintiff will not he entitled to the four per cent, damages.
Summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Cowt. I. Tlie right to recover damages does not accrue until the period of twenty days from maturity has elapsed. (R. C. 1855, p. 295, § 11.) If suit be instituted between maturity and the period of twenty days thereafter, plaintiff has no cause of action so far as damages are concerned. I. The principal sum was not paid within twenty days after demand. The plaintiff was entitled to recover damages.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Scott

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Scott, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit upon a negotiable promissory note by endorsee against maker and endorsers. Upon the trial it appeared that the suit was brought within the period of twenty days from the maturity of the note. The court gave judgment for the amount due on the face of the note, with damages at four per cent., and interest on the sum of the principal and damages from maturity. The allowance of the four per cent, damages is the matter of which complaint is made.

The eleventh section of the act concerning bills of exchange provides that “in cases of non-acceptance or non-payment of a bill drawn at any place within this state on any person at a place within the same, no damages shall be recovered, if payment of the principal sum, with interest and charges of *191 protest, be paid within twenty days after demand, or notice of the dishonor of the bill.” The fifteenth section of the act places negotiable promissory notes on the same footing as inland bills of exchange, if the notes are negotiated.

As this suit was brought within twenty days from the maturity of the note, we can not see that the plaintiff had any right to the four per cent, damages at the time of bringing his suit. If he has commenced his suit for damages before they were due, he can not recover. Judge Napton concurring, the judgment will be reversed and judgment will be rendered for the principal and interest without the four per cent, damages, and the costs of this court will be paid by the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1886–1887: 11894–1895: 118862026peak 1886 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lampert v. Haydel20 Mo. App. 616 (1886)
  2. F. O. Sawyer Paper Co. v. Mangan60 Mo. App. 76 (1894)

Most recent

  1. F. O. Sawyer Paper Co. v. Mangan60 Mo. App. 76 (1894)
  2. Lampert v. Haydel20 Mo. App. 616 (1886)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list