TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sudarth v. Cox

Robert Sudarth, in Error v. Thompson Cox, Administrator, in Error

Sudarth v. Cox, 33 Mo. 149 (1862)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1862
Judges
Bates, Bay, Dryden
Citations
33 Mo. 149
Headnotes
Practice. — Judgment affirmed, transcript not showing the papers by which the suit was begun.
Summary
Error to Lincoln Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bates

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes from the Circuit Court of Lincoln county, to which it was carried by appeal from a justice of the peace.

In the Circuit Court the cause was dismissed upon a motion of the defendant, which set out the following reasons :

1. Because the justice had no jurisdiction to hear and determine said cause, he being limited to the amount of fifty dollars for the value of the property.

2. Because this court has no jurisdiction of this cause.

3. Because the affidavit filed by the plaintiff is insufficient to sustain the action.

The transcript of the record filed in this court does not show the petition and affidavit by which the suit was begun before the justice. We are, therefore, unable to know whether or not the Circuit Court erred in dismissing the cause. We cannot, therefore, reverse the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list