Lombard v. Clark
Benj. Lombard, Jr., &c., in Error v. Luther D. Clark, in Error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Bates, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a suit to enforce specific peiTormance of a contract for the sale of land.
*309 The defendant, being nonresident, was notified of the suit by publication in a newspaper, and failing to appear, it was “ ordered and decreed by the court that the plaintiffs do recover and have judgment against defendant, and have an inquiry of damages at the next term of the court, and this matter is continued.” (No damages were prayed by the petition.)
At the next term this entry of judgment was made: “Come now the plaintiffs in .this cause by their attorneys, and having produced their evidence to the court, and the court having fully considered the evidence so adduced and plaintiffs’ petition, it is therefore ordered and decreed by the court that plaintiffs’ petition be dismissed, and that the defendant recover his costs herein.”
This judgment cannot be sustained. Upon the defendant’s failure to appear to the action within the time prescribed by law, an interlocutory judgment should have been given against him by default, (but no award of inquiry of damages,) and at the next term the judgment should have been made final, giving the relief asked in the petition.
After the judgment by default, and without any'appear anee by the defendant, the court had no power to try the case on its merits and render a judgment in favor of the defendant on the merits and for the recovery of costs.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded;
Judges Bay and Dryden concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.