TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Merritt v. Given

Jacob Merritt v. Henry T. Given

Merritt v. Given, 34 Mo. 98 (1863)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1863
Judges
Bates, Bay, Dryden
Citations
34 Mo. 98
Headnotes
Practice — Instructions.—Instructions must not assume the existence of the facts in issue before the jury.
Summary
Appeal from St. Louis Common Pleas Cou/rt. The fourth instruction given for the plaintiffs was as follows: “ The fact that plaintiffs gave instructions to defendants to sell the flour after it had been sold, not knowing it had been sold, will not justify a previous sale made without instructions, and contrary to plaintiffs’ orders, nor constitute any defence against such previous sale made contrary to plaintiffs’ orders.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bates

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment in this case is reversed because the fourth instruction given for the plaintiffs assumed the existence of facts which were the very matters in dispute proper for the consideration of the jury.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1881–1882: 11883–1884: 11887–1888: 11889–1890: 118812026peak 1881 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.26 Mo. App. 75 (1887) · Concurrence
  2. Siegrist v. Arnot10 Mo. App. 197 (1881)
  3. Wilkerson v. Thompson82 Mo. 317 (1884)
  4. Dulaney v. St. Louis Sugar Refining Co.42 Mo. App. 659 (1890)

Most recent

  1. Dulaney v. St. Louis Sugar Refining Co.42 Mo. App. 659 (1890)
  2. Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.26 Mo. App. 75 (1887) · Concurrence
  3. Wilkerson v. Thompson82 Mo. 317 (1884)
  4. Siegrist v. Arnot10 Mo. App. 197 (1881)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list