Adams v. Trigg
William D. Adams, Adm'r, &c., in Error v. William H. Trigg, in Error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Bates, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
There is no final judgment in this case. The record shows a trial and a verdict for the defendant, and proceeds as follows : “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf sustained, and that he have thereof his execution.” There is no “ final determination of the rights of the parties in the action. (Young v. Stonebreaker and others, 33 Mo. 117 .)
The writ of error is therefore dismissed.
Judge Dryden concurs ; Judge Bay absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.