TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Eads v. Vollmer

William A. Eads, in Error v. Frederick Vollmer, in Error

Eads v. Vollmer, 38 Mo. 357 (1866)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1866
Judges
Holmes, Lovelace, Wagner
Citations
38 Mo. 357
Headnotes
Practice— Snpreme Courts — The record not containing a copy of the petition and answer, and being so defective that the court cannot determine whether there be error or no, judgment affirmed.
Summary
Error to Gasconade Circuit.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Holmes

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the record is so incomplete that we cannot see with any certainty whether there was error in the judgment or not. There is no petition, or complaint, or answer. We are left to gather from the evidence presented in the bill of exceptions what the case was that was before the court.

The plaintiff in error failing to show to this court that any error has been committed, the judgment will be affirmed.

Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list