Baker v. Peacock
George A. Baker, Alexander Street, James G. Hamilton, John J. Kerr, Sam'l H. Woodson, and Andrew M. Eisle v. William Peacock, Adm'r of the Estate of H. Clay Pate, dec'd, and Joel T. Morris
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Holmes, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a petition for a scire facias to revive a judgment rendered in this court at the January term, 1861 — Morris v. Pate, 31 Mo. 315 . A scire facias was awarded at the last term of this court, which is returned duly served. The defendants do not appear to show cause why the judgment should not be revived and execution issue therein.
Let the judgment be revived and execution be issued.
The other judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.