Attwell v. Lynch
Thos. J. Attwell v. James Lynch
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Wagner, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The errors assigned by the appellant are the suppressing parts of certain depositions, the rejection of certain evidence, and the giving of improper instructions for the respondent. The depositions suppressed purported to give merely the *520 conversations between third parties, and attempted to make evidence out of memorandums, when the witness did not pretend to speak of their own knowledge. The evidence rejected was the copy of a deed, and no°effort was made to account for the original, nor was there anything to show that it had ever been executed. We see no error in the ruling of the court in excluding evidence or suppressing depositions. The instructions are unobjectionable ; those given for both parties state the law correctly and fairly, and are entirely consistent.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.