TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

First National Bank v. Currie

The First National Bank of Warsaw v. Thomas L. Currie

First Nat'l Bank v. Currie, 44 Mo. 91 (1869)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1869
Judges
Other, Wagner
Citations
44 Mo. 91
Headnotes
1. Practice, Civil — Prials—Instructions must bepredicateduponihe whole case. —Where, in the course of a trial, a fact was developed by the testimony of one witness, it was error for the court to instruct the jury that if they believed that fact to be true they should find for a designated party accordingly. Instructions should he predicated upon the whole case and take in all the evidence.
Summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wagner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only error discoverable in the record is the giving of plaintiff’s instruction, for which the judgment must be reversed. The issue was joined upon the indebtedness of the defendant as a *92 garnishee, and evidence was introduced upon both sides. A given fact was developed by one witness in the progress of the trial, and, at the instance of the plaintiff, the court instructed the jury that if they believed that fact to be true they should find for the plaintiff accordingly.

This was wrong. Instructions should be predicated upon the whole case and take in all the evidence. Courts are not at liberty to single' out a particular fact and tell the jury that they must find their verdict on that fact, and thus virtually withdraw all the other testimony from their consideration. The verdict must be founded upon a consideration of all the evidence.

Reversed and remanded.

The other judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1879–1880: 11885–1886: 11903–1904: 11905–1906: 11931–1932: 118792026peak 1879 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Perkins v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.49 S.W.2d 103 (Mo. 1932)
  2. United States Express Co. v. Jenkins25 N.W. 549 (Wis. 1885)
  3. Gage v. Mears80 S.W. 712 (Mo. Ct. App. 1904)
  4. McKnight-Keaton Grocery Co. v. Hudson92 S.W. 1130 (Mo. Ct. App. 1906)
  5. Sheedy v. Streeter70 Mo. 679 (1879)

Most recent

  1. Perkins v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.49 S.W.2d 103 (Mo. 1932)
  2. McKnight-Keaton Grocery Co. v. Hudson92 S.W. 1130 (Mo. Ct. App. 1906)
  3. Gage v. Mears80 S.W. 712 (Mo. Ct. App. 1904)
  4. United States Express Co. v. Jenkins25 N.W. 549 (Wis. 1885)
  5. Sheedy v. Streeter70 Mo. 679 (1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list