Barrow v. Davis
G. W. Barrow v. John W. Davis
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Wagner, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs filed their bill in the Macon County Circuit Court, praying for an injunction to restrain Forbes, the collector of the revenue, from the collection of certain school taxes which they alleged were irregularly and fraudulently levied. The court dismissed the bill as containing no equity, and its judgment was affirmed in the District Court.
In a case entirely similar in this court, it was said : “This is not a proper case for equitable relief. If the assessment be void, as alleged, it will not protect the officer, nor will a sale divest the *395 plaintiff of his property. The wrong can be fully compensated for at law. It is not in any sense an irreparable injury, and no reason exists for transferring the jurisdiction over such cases from law to equity. There is as yet no authority of this court, that we are aware of, to warrant this relief, and we arc not disposed to make one by sanctioning the present proceeding.” (Per Leonard, J., in Sayre v. Tompkins, 23 Mo. 443 .)
Let the judgment be affirmed.
The other judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.